So they picked one racist (the neo-Nazis) over another (Malkin). Big deal.

It's so easy to toss that accusation rather than actually thinking, isn't it.

Just as much thinking as it takes to say "pro-death liberal".

As far as I know, there's no Democrats out there trying to weed out the "unfit". Liberals argue that this is a personal family matter, to be dealt with in courts if need be. It's an abuse of power for Congress to intervene in a clearly judicial matter. What's next? Overruling cours in other cases? Could they overturn a decision against a nefarious employer?

I argue, therefore, that it's the conservatives who are opening the door for Communist-like supreme command of the state in private matters.

But there's lots of evidence of Malkin's racism. Actually, I take that back. It's not necessarily racism as much as it's xenophobia, but xenophobia isn't harsh enough of a word for her. Of course, that's an affliction that many on the right suffer from.

Arguing that an adulterous husband should be allowed to torture his wife to death over the objections of every single one of her blood relatives is a really strange way of "leaving it to the family" But it is a cushy rationalization for snuffing out the unfit.

Michelle Malkin happens to be an honest person who's done a thorough job of studying the history of the internment issue. She stepped on some Liberal revisionist toes and thus she's labeled a racist. Odd that the race she's accused of fearing/hating is her own. But then logic is rarely something Liberals have much use for.