Powered by
Movable Type 3.2
Design by
Danny Carlton





Made with NoteTab

November 29, 2005

Pedophiles for Choice take case to SCOTUS

From WorldNetDaily...

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow in a case that will determine whether a state can require parental notification before an abortion is performed on a minor, without providing a health exception....

In Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, New Hampshire's attorney general contends a health exception is not needed because the law allows a minor to go to a judge instead of a parent if her health is in danger. 

Opponents say that requirement could lead to life-threatening delays and puts medical decisions in the hands of judges....

Ironically, says [Eileen Roberts, founder and president of Mothers and Advocates for Mothers Alone], if a minor suffers injury during an abortion, a parent is called to an emergency room to sign consent forms. 

Practically, she says, children don't know their complete medical history, which is needed to perform any type of surgery. 

"To add insult to injury, parents are totally responsible for any follow-up care from abortion malpractice," said Roberts, who had that experience herself, with a 14-year-old daughter.

If the Pedophiles for Choice opposing the law were really all that concerned about the health of these children who are impregnated, then why do they also oppose Abortuaries being held to the same health standards as any other surgical facility?

Posted by Danny Carlton at November 29, 2005 05:59 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.jacklewis.net/cgi-bin/mt/jl-tb.cgi/2251

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Security verification

Type the characters you see in the image above.