Anti-Evolution Evolutionists

From ScienceDaily.com...

According to a sophisticated DNA analysis, five of nine "relic" populations of what biologists believed to be greenback cutthroat trout living in isolated pockets of the state actually are Colorado River cutthroat trout, a closely related subspecies, said lead author Jessica Metcalf, a researcher in CU-Boulder's ecology and evolutionary biology department. Eggs and sperm from the trout populations have been used for the last several decades to rear new generations in hatcheries, allowing state biologists to restock parts of Colorado with what they thought were greenback cutthroats, she said.

So let me see if I've got this straight. Followers of the religion that teaches the Supremacy of "Survival of the Fittest" have been working for two decades to ensure the survival of a fish that couldn't compete for food with other fish, only now to discover that they were actually breeding "another" fish so identical to the unfit version, that it took them this long to notice.

If the fish are so similar, who cares if one version dies out? Will it really hurt the world to lose yet another variation of fish that can't compete? And for that matter, how can we know they're sure even now. They've been wrong for two decades by their own admission, but now they want us to believe they've got it right?

Why are Evolutionists working against their own religion to ensure the survival of an unfit "species"? (I use quotes because the term "species" has a vary odd definition when used by Evolutionists, having little to do with real science)

And most importantly, who paid for all this nonsense? Are the American taxpayers footing the bill for yet another boondoggle?

Posted by Danny Carlton at September 6, 2007 9:55 AM