But then strippers aren't usually known for their discretion, are they.

From Sky News...

The pupil's mum had ordered an agency to give her son a "surprise" on his 16th birthday - and the teacher had even agreed to film the prank.

But it all went wrong when the unnamed company sent a stripper dressed as a policewoman instead of a "gorillagram" - in what it called a booking error.

One witness told reporters: "She asked the lad to stand up, which he did, and told him he had been a very naughty boy because he hadn't been doing his homework.

"Then she put on some Britney Spears music and got out a collar and lead [leash] from her bag and told him to put them on."

After walking the boy round the classroom and spanking him with a whip - the action turned even more blue.

At that point, the articles says, the stripper began removing her clothes. It wasn't until she was wearing nothing but scanty underwear and began performing some rather lewd acts that I won't repeat, that the teacher decided to put and end to it.

The mother had no idea. The agent was incompetent. As the title says, strippers aren't known for their discretion. But the teacher should have stopped it when the collar and leash were brought out. My guess is that's where the bulk of the blame will eventually be lain, on the teacher.

Although I can just imagine the student's friends saying to him, "Dude, you've got the coolest mom!!" (or whatever the British equivalent to that would be)

Posted by Danny Carlton at November 9, 2007 6:13 AM