What's My Google PageRank?

Powered by
Movable Type 3.31
Design by
Danny Carlton





Made with NoteTab


August 7, 2008

Blacklists: Out with the old; In with the new

From WorldNetDaily...

SB 1322, a plan by state Sen. Alan Lowenthal, was approved by lawmakers and forwarded to Schwarzenegger for his signature or veto, officials with the pro-family Capital Resource Institute said today....

Officials said the bill "will banish from current law the ability of schools to fire teachers for being Communists. It will also allow Communists to use public school property for their meetings."

"During floor debate on the bill Monday afternoon, minority Republican lawmakers attempted to at least insert language banning terrorists from teaching in schools or using government property as they conspire against innocent American citizens. The amendments to SB 1322 were voted down by the majority Democrats," the group said.

Hollywood has been screaming against the idea of blacklisting people based on political ideology since it was discovered that there were so many Communist spies and sympathizers there. Liberals see Communists as people that have simply taken "good" ideas a tad too far. Therefore they don't see them as a real threat, even though there has never existed a Communist country where the people were free and didn't suffer abuse and deprivation.

However, it seems Hollywood doesn't mind the idea of blacklisting some people.

From Politico...

The political blogsosphere, of course, went ballistic. Then Jeffrey Wells, who runs the movie and pop culture site Hollywood-Elsewhere.com, took [ actor John] Voight to task for his [political] right turn and wrote that, if he were a studio executive, he might think twice before hiring Voight for any future film work. “[Voight is] obviously entitled to say and write whatever he wants,” wrote Wells. “But it's only natural that industry-based Obama supporters will henceforth regard him askance. Honestly? If I were a producer and I had to make a casting decision about hiring Voight or some older actor who hadn't pissed me off with an idiotic Washington Times op-ed piece, I might very well say to myself, ‘Voight? Let him eat cake.'"

While Wells was condemned by some Hollywood people, one has to wonder whether it was for his idea of blacklisting conservatives, or simply his foolishness in publicly voicing something Hollywood has been doing for decades.

Posted by Danny Carlton at August 7, 2008 7:02 AM

Comments

Is your point that we should create a list of approved political parties and deny
those that are not on the list the same basic rights as the Democrats and Republicans?

I bet you are an advocate for only having the Republican Party and outlawing all others.

Unfortunately for you we live in a democracy. Even though you might think that Communists
are Satanic spawn, they have the same constitutional rights to free speech and assembly that your party has.

Allowing "terrorists" to teach or use the resources of a school system is a canard. Terrorism is by definition in our country is a crime and the individuals would be in prison. Furthermore the act of inciting terroristic acts falls under the category of speech that is NOT protected by the Constitution and is illegal.

My understanding is people would have been required to 1) sign a document that states they
are not a terrorist 2) allow people to be fired for their political views.

The first issue is absurd because a terrorist would lie. The second component is not constitutional.

How would you define a terrorist in this context? Skin color? Not acknowledging the state of Israel? What
if ten years from now the new definition of "terrorist" includes Christian conservatives because they are responsible for bombing abortion clinics again?

This is an excellent example of the adage that every complex problem has at least one simple
solution that is wrong.

I really did not get your point about some blog that does not like some actor. I bet Chuck Norris would (for those that read this, he was a Republican "sweet hart" not too long ago) not have understood it either. If I am not being obvious enough, it is not the same thing.

I was surprised to find that you are an apologist for Senator Joseph McCarthy's actions. I thought
as a society we were past that mentality.

Posted by: Santo Gold at August 8, 2008 2:21 AM

Post a comment

NOTE: I am under no obligation to preserve the incoherent mutterings of illiterate morons. I have no problem with people disagreeing with me, but make sure you actually know what you're talking about, or your comment will be removed.




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)

Rare Disease Search Engine, Homeschool Sites, Online Homeschool, Online Income, Ethical Adsense, Creative writing, Family Web Hosting, Christian Radio, Tulsa Parks