Danny Carlton

Danny Carlton is an author, a web programmer and occasional political commentator. His books include Memorite Rogue, Earth Suit and Liberal Logic 101. You can find his books at DannyCarlton.net and his ministry sites at DannyCarlton.org.

Logical Fallacies, Part 3: Bad Evidence

by


I saw a meme once of a stern-looking cop leaning into a car window. The caption: “Looks like you’ve had a bit too much to think.”

In Part 1 we covered fallacies that dodge the point. In Part 2 we covered fallacies that rig the question before you can answer it. Bad Evidence fallacies are sneakier than both, because they actually look like they’re doing the work. They come with numbers. Studies. Historical precedents. Personal testimony. They feel like proof. They just aren’t.

These are arguments that mishandle or fabricate evidence. They don’t dodge the question or rig the frame. They answer the question with data that doesn’t actually support the conclusion. And they’re harder to catch, because you have to check the evidence instead of just the structure.

Read more

Logical Fallacies, Part 2: False Framing

by


There are only two kinds of people in the world: those who believe in false dichotomies, and Purple Penguins.

If that sentence made you pause, good. You just felt a False Framing fallacy doing its work. The sentence has the structure of a reasonable claim. The options are set. But they’re rigged before you even get to evaluate them. There’s no third choice, no “wait, those aren’t the only two options,” no room to step back and question the setup.

That’s False Framing. And it’s more dangerous than the Misdirection fallacies we covered in Part 1, because misdirection at least lets you see the real argument before it changes the subject. False Framing makes the real argument invisible. It rigs the question so that any answer you give concedes the point.

Read more

Logical Fallacies, Part 1: Misdirection

by


Ronald Reagan loved telling Soviet jokes. One of his favorites went like this: An American and a Soviet citizen were comparing their countries. “We have freedom in the US,” the American said. “I can walk right up to the White House and shout ‘Reagan sucks!’ and no one will stop me.” “We have the same freedom,” the Soviet replied. “I can walk right up to the Kremlin and shout ‘Reagan sucks!’ and no one will stop me either.”

Reagan told that joke to Gorbachev’s face at the Iceland summit. He told it to audiences for years. The punchline works because the Soviet citizen technically said something true while completely dodging the actual point. That’s misdirection. And if you watched any coverage of the No Kings protests, you saw it everywhere.

Fallacies of Misdirection are arguments that dodge the real point. They might sound like a response, but the actual argument has been quietly swapped for something else. These are the most common fallacies in political debate because they’re the easiest to pull off. You don’t need a counter-argument. You just need to make the real argument disappear.

Read more

The Clean Tub Equation

by


Your bathtub is dirty. You know it’s dirty. Every time you step in you notice it, and every time you step out you think,

I really need to clean that.

You don’t clean it.

Not because you’re lazy (although, sure, maybe a little). Not because you don’t care. You don’t clean it because the math doesn’t work yet.

Read more

The Abortion Wars, Part 5: The Pattern

by


Part 5 of 5

In Part 2, I mentioned a woman named Terri Schiavo. Time to come back to her.

On February 25, 1990, Terri Schiavo suffered cardiac arrest in her Florida apartment. She was twenty-six. The resulting oxygen deprivation left her severely brain-damaged, and she was eventually diagnosed with a persistent vegetative state. She was not dying. She was not on a ventilator. She was breathing on her own. She received nutrition through a feeding tube.

Read more

The Abortion Wars, Part 4: Racketeers for Life

by


Part 4 of 5

In 1986, the National Organization for Women sued a man named Joseph Scheidler under RICO.

If that acronym sounds familiar, it should. The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act was passed in 1970 to prosecute the Mafia. It was designed for organized crime (for extortion, loan-sharking, murder-for-hire, drug trafficking). The law’s creators never imagined it would be pointed at a Catholic pro-life activist from Chicago who organized sidewalk protests outside abortion clinics.

Read more

The Abortion Wars, Part 3: The Legal Fiction

by


Part 3 of 5

Norma McCorvey wanted an abortion. What she got was a pseudonym.

In 1970, McCorvey was pregnant with her third child in Texas, where abortion was illegal except to save the mother’s life. She was referred to two attorneys, Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington, who needed a plaintiff for a federal challenge to Texas’s abortion law. They needed her name on the filing. They didn’t particularly need her.

Read more

The Abortion Wars, Part 2: The Roots

by


Part 2 of 5

In 1798, an English clergyman named Thomas Malthus published An Essay on the Principle of Population and managed to be spectacularly wrong about nearly everything in it. His thesis was simple: human population grows faster than food production, so eventually everyone starves. His solution was equally simple: stop helping the poor. Charity, he argued, only encouraged the lower classes to breed, which made the problem worse. Nature would handle things if we’d just step aside and let the weak die off. He was wrong about the math (agricultural innovation has consistently outpaced population growth for over two centuries), wrong about the economics, and wrong about human ingenuity. But being wrong about everything didn’t stop his ideas from becoming enormously influential. It rarely does.

Read more

The Abortion Wars, Part 1: The Psychological Foundation

by


Part 1 of 5

To ensure devotion from the children they kidnapped and used as soldiers, the Revolutionary United Front in Sierra Leone would attack a village, kill most of the adults and then take the children. They would take a child and force them to murder one of the surviving adults, preferably their own parent. Once done, the child was theirs for life. The RUF became their new family.

The Khmer Rouge used a variation, where young “recruits” were put through what the regime called “forging” where they participated in an execution. Once they had innocent blood on their hands, they belonged to the Angkar (“the organization”) forever (or so the leader thought*.)

Read more

Being Charlie, Part 5: The Vacuum

by


Fifth and final in a series on what it would actually take to mean it when you say “I am Charlie Kirk.”

In 1982, Christian singer-songwriter Keith Green died in a plane crash at twenty-eight years old. He’d built one of the most dynamic ministries in contemporary Christian music, not just a career but a genuine movement, complete with a ministry campus, a publishing operation, and a following that took him seriously because he took them seriously. He challenged comfortable Christianity the way Kirk challenged comfortable conservatism: by showing up in person and making people uncomfortable.

When Green died, his fans were in shock. He’d built something so large, so personal, so tied to his own energy and conviction, that the obvious question hit everyone at the same time: Who’s going to do it now?

And they answered themselves. I guess I need to.

Read more